<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Evening With Rob Bell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-158</guid>
		<description>People.  Calm down.
The Emergent Church is harmless and Rob Bell seems like a pretty good guy.  Love the nooma videos.  I think the fact that there are over 33,000 denominations should make everyone cut each other a bit of slack; not sure anyone is tapped into the 'exact' truth of what Jesus wants from His church. I mean, 33,000? The things Christians choose to fight about makes me laugh and cry at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People.  Calm down.<br />
The Emergent Church is harmless and Rob Bell seems like a pretty good guy.  Love the nooma videos.  I think the fact that there are over 33,000 denominations should make everyone cut each other a bit of slack; not sure anyone is tapped into the &#8216;exact&#8217; truth of what Jesus wants from His church. I mean, 33,000? The things Christians choose to fight about makes me laugh and cry at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tammy</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Error: please fill the required fields (name, email).

Yep that's what happens when you press the Say it! button before you enter your name and email.Then when you arrow back the comments are all gone.

Guess I might type up my musings again later .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Error: please fill the required fields (name, email).</p>
<p>Yep that&#8217;s what happens when you press the Say it! button before you enter your name and email.Then when you arrow back the comments are all gone.</p>
<p>Guess I might type up my musings again later &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Tim, thanks for expressing your concerns respectfully. 

I thought Doug was simply being honest when he said he follows Jesus because he got there first. 

I think that's true for a lot of people. How many Christians just before becoming a Christian said "Wait - I need to go check out every other religion first!" Not many, I'm guessing. So they, like Doug, follow Jesus because they got there first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, thanks for expressing your concerns respectfully. </p>
<p>I thought Doug was simply being honest when he said he follows Jesus because he got there first. </p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s true for a lot of people. How many Christians just before becoming a Christian said &#8220;Wait - I need to go check out every other religion first!&#8221; Not many, I&#8217;m guessing. So they, like Doug, follow Jesus because they got there first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Wright</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Learned lots from your folks in the past years. Recently listened to "
Off The Map Interview with Rob Bell, Todd Hunter, Doug Pagitt, &#38; Sunil Sardar" 

I think it was Jim asking the people why they following Jesus. I was shocked, honestly shocked, especially by Doug who follows Jesus because he got their first.  Wow that is really sad? What about Jesus being who he said he was,  " I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."

Not bad, but not as good as  He got their first. That does not have the authority to transform a culture let alone set us free from our sin.

Please, don't loose the moorings of the TRUTH of Jesus. I know Truth in the emergent world can give off bad vibes, but your gift of helping us to walk in OE will be lost if we don't lift Jesus to whom he is: "LORD OF ALL"

Bless you

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Learned lots from your folks in the past years. Recently listened to &#8221;<br />
Off The Map Interview with Rob Bell, Todd Hunter, Doug Pagitt, &amp; Sunil Sardar&#8221; </p>
<p>I think it was Jim asking the people why they following Jesus. I was shocked, honestly shocked, especially by Doug who follows Jesus because he got their first.  Wow that is really sad? What about Jesus being who he said he was,  &#8221; I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not bad, but not as good as  He got their first. That does not have the authority to transform a culture let alone set us free from our sin.</p>
<p>Please, don&#8217;t loose the moorings of the TRUTH of Jesus. I know Truth in the emergent world can give off bad vibes, but your gift of helping us to walk in OE will be lost if we don&#8217;t lift Jesus to whom he is: &#8220;LORD OF ALL&#8221;</p>
<p>Bless you</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Benjamin, I've learned that technique too and also found it very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin, I&#8217;ve learned that technique too and also found it very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin ady</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin ady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Tammy,

  You rock =)

  And

  When you say "I love you, but ....", I feel ... distrustful.

  And

  I see what you mean

  And.

  I meant to say ... that I learned this really kewl helpful technique for deescalating conflict in relationships from &lt;a href="http://www.realrelationships.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Les and Leslie Parrott&lt;/a&gt; which is about complaining rather than criticizing.  The way it is supposed to work is that when I feel negative emotion toward her, rather than criticizing my super lovely spouse (i.e., "You make me so mad" or "You never ______" or "You always _______" etc.), I ought to (there, I put an oughty should on myself) choose to complain instead.  Complaining can be accomplished using the XYZ model:  "In situation X, when you do or say Y, I feel Z."

  By the way, the "Z" here, in our household, is to be pronounced in the Australian fashion, "zed".

  Sometimes this leads to a bit of hilarity, if I am feeling very strong negative emotion, accomanied by a generalized inability to put it into words, I will simply say with strong emotion the actual formula to her, including the actual "XY and ZED" rather than filling them in with the situation appropriate words.

  I have found this ongoingly and enormously helpful relationally with both my spouse and others.

  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy,</p>
<p>  You rock =)</p>
<p>  And</p>
<p>  When you say &#8220;I love you, but &#8230;.&#8221;, I feel &#8230; distrustful.</p>
<p>  And</p>
<p>  I see what you mean</p>
<p>  And.</p>
<p>  I meant to say &#8230; that I learned this really kewl helpful technique for deescalating conflict in relationships from <a href="http://www.realrelationships.com/" rel="nofollow">Les and Leslie Parrott</a> which is about complaining rather than criticizing.  The way it is supposed to work is that when I feel negative emotion toward her, rather than criticizing my super lovely spouse (i.e., &#8220;You make me so mad&#8221; or &#8220;You never ______&#8221; or &#8220;You always _______&#8221; etc.), I ought to (there, I put an oughty should on myself) choose to complain instead.  Complaining can be accomplished using the XYZ model:  &#8220;In situation X, when you do or say Y, I feel Z.&#8221;</p>
<p>  By the way, the &#8220;Z&#8221; here, in our household, is to be pronounced in the Australian fashion, &#8220;zed&#8221;.</p>
<p>  Sometimes this leads to a bit of hilarity, if I am feeling very strong negative emotion, accomanied by a generalized inability to put it into words, I will simply say with strong emotion the actual formula to her, including the actual &#8220;XY and ZED&#8221; rather than filling them in with the situation appropriate words.</p>
<p>  I have found this ongoingly and enormously helpful relationally with both my spouse and others.</p>
<p>  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Tammy wrote &lt;blockquote&gt;You said,"You know what I mean, right?"&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, he did, didn't he? :)

I understand where Benjamin's coming from. Making negative assertions about other people is very inflammatory. But as you point out "You" statements that are compliments are very affirming. I hope Benjamin is not going to end his delightful practice of posting "You rock!" just because it's a "you" statement. 

I prefer "I agree with you" and "I disagree with you" over "you are right" or "you are wrong" &lt;em&gt;except&lt;/em&gt; where I am qualified to use the latter statements, for example, if I am responding to a comment about me. I think those latter statements should be backed up with evidence so they show I have reasons for what I say. Rather than implying I have all knowledge - which is what it implies if I make assertions someone is right or wrong without backing up what I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy wrote<br />
<blockquote>You said,&#8221;You know what I mean, right?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, he did, didn&#8217;t he? <img src='http://offthemap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I understand where Benjamin&#8217;s coming from. Making negative assertions about other people is very inflammatory. But as you point out &#8220;You&#8221; statements that are compliments are very affirming. I hope Benjamin is not going to end his delightful practice of posting &#8220;You rock!&#8221; just because it&#8217;s a &#8220;you&#8221; statement. </p>
<p>I prefer &#8220;I agree with you&#8221; and &#8220;I disagree with you&#8221; over &#8220;you are right&#8221; or &#8220;you are wrong&#8221; <em>except</em> where I am qualified to use the latter statements, for example, if I am responding to a comment about me. I think those latter statements should be backed up with evidence so they show I have reasons for what I say. Rather than implying I have all knowledge - which is what it implies if I make assertions someone is right or wrong without backing up what I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tammy</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 05:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-147</guid>
		<description>benjamin,
I just thought you might like to give your comment( what you said:-) about "palatable" some more thought if shown the problem with it.It would be sad to limit yours or someone elses art of communication  by judgements that aren't accurate. I would hate to see you avoid “You did ….” “You said ….” “You are ….” or want someone else too.

I love you, but you are wrong.  

I hate you but you are right.

You are beautiful, I don't like you though.

You are mean , but I see your point.
Even though I think you are mean, it doesn't make you wrong.

I must speak out against your teachings, as you have spoken out against my teaching. We may find we are both  wrong.I assume the best, that you do it with the same concern as me. 

I am YELLING because I am mad.

You are gracious and you lift my spirit.
You said  beautiful things.
You did say that?

You said,"You know what I mean, right?" 

So can we agree? :-)

love tammy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>benjamin,<br />
I just thought you might like to give your comment( what you said:-) about &#8220;palatable&#8221; some more thought if shown the problem with it.It would be sad to limit yours or someone elses art of communication  by judgements that aren&#8217;t accurate. I would hate to see you avoid “You did ….” “You said ….” “You are ….” or want someone else too.</p>
<p>I love you, but you are wrong.  </p>
<p>I hate you but you are right.</p>
<p>You are beautiful, I don&#8217;t like you though.</p>
<p>You are mean , but I see your point.<br />
Even though I think you are mean, it doesn&#8217;t make you wrong.</p>
<p>I must speak out against your teachings, as you have spoken out against my teaching. We may find we are both  wrong.I assume the best, that you do it with the same concern as me. </p>
<p>I am YELLING because I am mad.</p>
<p>You are gracious and you lift my spirit.<br />
You said  beautiful things.<br />
You did say that?</p>
<p>You said,&#8221;You know what I mean, right?&#8221; </p>
<p>So can we agree? <img src='http://offthemap.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
love tammy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin ady</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin ady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-146</guid>
		<description>One thing I've been noticing on this blog and JaC over the last few days is that .... "I" statements are so much more palatable (hearable) than "you" statements.  I knew this from previously, but it's just been really clear in an examplish kind of way the last little while =).

 You know what I mean, right?  "I feel ...." "I hear ...." "I am ...." rather than "You did ...." "You said ...." "You are ...."  This is especially true when there are some negative emotions going on for people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I&#8217;ve been noticing on this blog and JaC over the last few days is that &#8230;. &#8220;I&#8221; statements are so much more palatable (hearable) than &#8220;you&#8221; statements.  I knew this from previously, but it&#8217;s just been really clear in an examplish kind of way the last little while =).</p>
<p> You know what I mean, right?  &#8220;I feel &#8230;.&#8221; &#8220;I hear &#8230;.&#8221; &#8220;I am &#8230;.&#8221; rather than &#8220;You did &#8230;.&#8221; &#8220;You said &#8230;.&#8221; &#8220;You are &#8230;.&#8221;  This is especially true when there are some negative emotions going on for people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://offthemap.com/2008/04/17/an-evening-with-rob-bell/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://offthemap.com/?p=84#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Tammy, I'm glad you attend a church which affirms and implements women in leadership. I can see how it would be helpful to not be the only woman in a particular team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy, I&#8217;m glad you attend a church which affirms and implements women in leadership. I can see how it would be helpful to not be the only woman in a particular team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
